Pulse Protein — cross-standard identity
Derived crosswalk of how one pet-food ingredient is named and defined across jurisdictions. No claim of regulatory equivalence is made — the pairing is anchored on Latin name + process and the verdict states where the definitions actually diverge.
- Latin anchor: Acceptable pulse
- Process anchor: AAFCO
60.115"Pulse Protein"; EU3.11.9"Pea protein" - Verdict:
closest_with_differences
Per-jurisdiction entry
- 🇺🇸 AAFCO (US) — Ch.6
60.115"Pulse Protein": is the protein fraction of pulse seeds. It is obtained from mechanically dehulled, dry milled pulse seeds that are further separated through air classification or the addition of water, acid, and alkali. The ingredient may be obtained from pulse seed separated by dry separation, wet separation, or both. Pulse crops include the edible seeds of legumes (excluding oil seeds). Acceptable pulse crops are listed below. The ingredient must contain not less than 53% crude protein on a dry matter basis, and a label shall include a guarantee for minimum crude protein. If a conditioning agent is used, the name of the conditioning agent must be shown as an added ingredient. If the ingredient bears a name descriptive of its kind or origin, it must correspond thereto. (Proposed 2016 rev. 1, Published 2018) Accepted pulse crops: Lentil (Lens culinaris) _(src: AAFCO OP 2024 Ch.6, code 60.115)_ - 🇪🇺 EU — Reg 68/2013
3.11.9"Pea protein": Product obtained from the separated pea fruit water when producing starch, or after grinding and air fractionation, maybe partially hydrolysed. _(src: EU Reg 68/2013 Annex, code 3.11.9)_ - 🇨🇳 CN — 公告1773: name "豆类蛋白" was not confirmed in the parsed 饲料原料目录 (Ann.1773); it may instead fall under the 饲料添加剂目录 (Ann.2045) or be absent. Marked as no confirmed CN 原料 entry. _(src: 农业部公告第1773号 饲料原料目录 — not found)_
Crosswalk verdict
The AAFCO and EU entries are the closest with differences pair for this ingredient (matched on name + Latin/process anchor). Differences in allowed species, ash/protein limits, or processing wording are noted per cell above rather than asserted as identical.
Multilingual names (official where free)
- EN (AAFCO/EU): see per-jurisdiction entry above
- ZH (CN): 豆类蛋白
- BG (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Грахов протеин
- CS (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): hrachový protein
- DA (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Ærteprotein
- DE (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Erbsenprotein
- EL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Πρωτεΐνες πίσων
- ES (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Proteína de guisantes
- ET (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Herneproteiin
- FI (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Hernevalkuainen
- FR (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Protéine de pois
- GA (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): not available in Irish (GA) on EUR-Lex — document 32013R0068 was never translated into Irish
- HR (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Bjelančevine graška
- HU (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Borsófehérje
- IT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Proteina di piselli
- LT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Žirnių baltymai
- LV (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Zirņu proteīns
- MT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Proteina tal-piżelli
- NL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Erwteneiwit
- PL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Białko grochu
- PT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Proteína de ervilha
- RO (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Proteine din mazăre
- SK (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Hrachová bielkovina
- SL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): beljakovine graha
- SV (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Ärtprotein
- JA (FAMIC 飼料の公定規格 別表): えんどうたん白 _(closest: FAMIC lists えんどうたん白 (pea protein); pulse = legumes broadly)_
- KO (사료 등의 기준 및 규격 별표 5, law.go.kr admRulSeq 2100000263778): pending — authoritative feed-material list published only as HWP (Hangul Word Processor), which could not be parsed in this environment
- RU (EAEU ТР feed): pending — the cited ТР ТС 024/2011 is the oils/fats regulation; an EAEU feed technical regulation is not in-force on eec.eaeunion.org and national texts (adilet.zan.kz, souzkombikorm.ru) are unreachable from this environment
> Method: derived_from_dataset. Every quoted name/definition is from the first-hand source cited per cell. Equivalence is a derived editorial judgement anchored on Latin name + process; where jurisdictions use different regulatory units the verdict is closest_with_differences / no_confirmed_equivalent rather than 'same'.