Poultry By-Product Meal — cross-standard identity
Derived crosswalk of how one pet-food ingredient is named and defined across three jurisdictions. No claim of regulatory equivalence is made — pairings are anchored on Latin name + process and the verdict states where the definitions actually diverge.
- Latin anchor: Gallus gallus / birds of the order Galliformes
- Process anchor: ground, rendered clean parts of poultry carcass (necks, feet, undeveloped eggs, viscera, whole carcasses), excl. added feathers; Ca ≤ 2.2× P
- Verdict:
closest_with_differences
Per-jurisdiction entry
- 🇺🇸 AAFCO (US) — Ch.6
9.10"Poultry By-Product Meal": the ground, rendered, clean parts of the carcass of poultry, such as necks, feet, undeveloped eggs, viscera, and whole carcasses, exclusive of added feathers, except in such amounts as might occur unavoidably in good processing practices. The label shall include guarantees for minimum crude protein, minimum crude fat, maximum calcium (Ca), and minimum phosphorus (P). The calcium (Ca) level shall not exceed the actual level of phosphorus (P) by more than 2.2 times. If the product bears a name descriptive of its kind, the name must correspond thereto. It shall be suitable for use in animal food. (Proposed 1985, Adopted 1990, Amended 2000, Proposed 2016 rev. 1, Adopted 2018 rev. 1) _(src: AAFCO OP 2024 Ch.6, code 9.10)_ - 🇪🇺 EU — Reg 68/2013
9.11.1"Feather meal": Product obtained by drying and grinding feathers of slaughtered animals, it may be hydrolysed. _(src: EU Reg 68/2013 Annex, code 9.11.1)_ - 🇨🇳 CN — 公告1773
禽副产物粉: not listed as a standalone entry in 公告1773 饲料原料目录; framework: 公告1773 is a positive list, the ingredient name must match the directory. _(src: 公告1773)_
Crosswalk verdict
AAFCO 'Poultry By-Product Meal' (9.10). EU closest is 'Feather meal' (9.11.1) for feathers plus generic PAP (9.4.1); there is no dedicated 'poultry by-product meal' entry. CN lists '禽副产物粉' (poultry by-product meal) as a category-9 entry. Same substance class; EU unit is split/ category-based.
Multilingual names (official where free)
- EN (AAFCO/EU): see per-jurisdiction entry above
- ZH (CN): 禽副产物粉 (extraction pending)
- BG (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Брашно от пера
- CS (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): péřová moučka
- DA (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Fjermel
- DE (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Federnmehl
- EL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Πτεράλευρο
- ES (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Harina de plumas
- ET (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Sulejahu
- FI (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Höyhenjauho
- FR (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Farine de plumes
- GA (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): not available in Irish (GA) on EUR-Lex — document 32013R0068 was never translated into Irish
- HR (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Brašno od perja
- HU (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Toll-liszt
- IT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Farina di piume
- LT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Plunksnų miltai
- LV (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Spalvu milti
- MT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Smida tar-rix
- NL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Verenmeel
- PL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Mączka z piór
- PT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Farinha de penas
- RO (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Făină de pene
- SK (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Perová múčka
- SL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): perna moka
- SV (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Fjädermjöl
- JA (FAMIC 飼料の公定規格 別表): pending — no corresponding entry in the FAMIC feed catalogue
- KO (사료 등의 기준 및 규격 별표 5, law.go.kr admRulSeq 2100000263778): pending — authoritative feed-material list published only as HWP (Hangul Word Processor), which could not be parsed in this environment
- RU (EAEU ТР feed): pending — the cited ТР ТС 024/2011 is the oils/fats regulation; an EAEU feed technical regulation is not in-force on eec.eaeunion.org and national texts (adilet.zan.kz, souzkombikorm.ru) are unreachable from this environment
> Method: derived_from_dataset. Every quoted name/definition is from the first-hand source cited per cell. Equivalence is a derived editorial judgement anchored on Latin name + process; where jurisdictions use different regulatory units (named meal vs category-based PAP) the verdict is regulatory_divergence / no_confirmed_equivalent rather than 'same'.