Ammonium Sulfate — cross-standard identity
Derived crosswalk of how one pet-food ingredient is named and defined across jurisdictions. No claim of regulatory equivalence is made — the pairing is anchored on Latin name + process and the verdict states where the definitions actually diverge.
- Latin anchor: — (not stated in source)
- Process anchor: AAFCO
57.27"Ammonium Sulfate"; EU11.8.1"Ammonium sulphate" - Verdict:
closest_with_differences
Per-jurisdiction entry
- 🇺🇸 AAFCO (US) — Ch.6
57.27"Ammonium Sulfate": is the product resulting from the neutralization of sulfuric acid with ammonia. It shall contain not less than 21% nitrogen (N) and not less than 24% sulfur (S). It shall contain not more than 75 ppm arsenic (As) and 30 ppm heavy metals reported as lead. This does not include ammonium sulfate made from by-product ammonia recovered from coke-oven gas. It shall be used only in ruminant feeds as a source of sulfur and nitrogen in an amount that supplies not more than 2% of equivalent crude protein in the total daily ration. If a premix, concentrate, or supplement contains more than 2% of equivalent crude protein from ammonium sulfate, the label shall have adequate directions for use and a prominent statement, “Caution--This feed shall be used only in accordance with directions furnished on the label.” (Proposed 1969, Published 1972) Reg. 582.1143 _(src: AAFCO OP 2024 Ch.6, code 57.27)_ - 🇪🇺 EU — Reg 68/2013
11.8.1"Ammonium sulphate": Ammonium sulphate ((NH4)2SO4) obtained by chemical synthesis. _(src: EU Reg 68/2013 Annex, code 11.8.1)_ - 🇨🇳 CN — 公告1773: name "硫酸铵" was not confirmed in the parsed 饲料原料目录 (Ann.1773); it may instead fall under the 饲料添加剂目录 (Ann.2045) or be absent. Marked as no confirmed CN 原料 entry. _(src: 农业部公告第1773号 饲料原料目录 — not found)_
Crosswalk verdict
The AAFCO and EU entries are the closest with differences pair for this ingredient (matched on name + Latin/process anchor). Differences in allowed species, ash/protein limits, or processing wording are noted per cell above rather than asserted as identical.
Multilingual names (official where free)
- EN (AAFCO/EU): see per-jurisdiction entry above
- ZH (CN): 硫酸铵
- BG (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Амониев сулфат
- CS (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): síran amonný
- DA (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Ammoniumsulfat
- DE (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Ammoniumsulfat
- EL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Θειικό αμμώνιο
- ES (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Sulfato de amonio
- ET (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Ammooniumsulfaat
- FI (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Ammoniumsulfaatti
- FR (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Sulfate d’ammonium
- GA (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): not available in Irish (GA) on EUR-Lex — document 32013R0068 was never translated into Irish
- HR (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Amonijev sulfat
- HU (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Ammónium-szulfát
- IT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Solfato di ammonio
- LT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Amonio sulfatas
- LV (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Amonija sulfāts
- MT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Sulfat tal-ammonju
- NL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Ammoniumsulfaat
- PL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Siarczan amonu
- PT (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Sulfato de amónio
- RO (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Sulfat de amoniu
- SK (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Síran amónny
- SL (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): amonijev sulfat
- SV (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official): Ammoniumsulfat
- JA (FAMIC 飼料の公定規格 別表): pending — no corresponding entry in the FAMIC feed catalogue
- KO (사료 등의 기준 및 규격 별표 5, law.go.kr admRulSeq 2100000263778): pending — authoritative feed-material list published only as HWP (Hangul Word Processor), which could not be parsed in this environment
- RU (EAEU ТР feed): pending — the cited ТР ТС 024/2011 is the oils/fats regulation; an EAEU feed technical regulation is not in-force on eec.eaeunion.org and national texts (adilet.zan.kz, souzkombikorm.ru) are unreachable from this environment
> Method: derived_from_dataset. Every quoted name/definition is from the first-hand source cited per cell. Equivalence is a derived editorial judgement anchored on Latin name + process; where jurisdictions use different regulatory units the verdict is closest_with_differences / no_confirmed_equivalent rather than 'same'.