Radish seed — cross-standard identity (EU Reg 68/2013 / CN 公告1773)
Derived crosswalk pairing a CN 公告1773 feed-ingredient entry with its EU Reg 68/2013 counterpart, anchored on the identical Latin binomial confirmed in both source lines. No claim of regulatory equivalence is made beyond the botanical/process anchor stated.
- Latin anchor: Raphanus sativus
- Process anchor: CN
7.6.57"莱菔子"; EU5.32.1"Radish seed" - Verdict:
equivalent
Per-jurisdiction entry
- 🇺🇸 AAFCO (US): No standalone Ch.6 feed-material entry found for "Radish seed". AAFCO OP 2024 lists only byproducts/middlings of this plant (e.g. middlings, hulls, meal), not the whole seed/grain as a defined feed material. Verdict = no_confirmed_equivalent for the AAFCO axis. _(src: AAFCO OP 2024 Ch.6 — no matching standalone entry)_
- 🇪🇺 EU — Reg 68/2013
5.32.1"Radish seed": Seeds of Raphanus sativus L. _(src: EU Reg 68/2013 Annex, code 5.32.1)_
- 🇨🇳 CN — 公告1773
7.6.57"莱菔子": 莱菔子 十字花科萝卜属植物萝卜(Raphanus sativus L.)的 干燥成熟种子。 _(src: 农业部公告第1773号 饲料原料目录, code 7.6.57)_
Crosswalk verdict
The CN 公告1773 entry and the EU Reg 68/2013 entry name the same botanical species (confirmed by an identical Latin binomial in both source descriptions) and are the equivalent pair for this ingredient. AAFCO OP 2024 has no standalone feed-material entry for this item (only byproducts/middlings), so the AAFCO axis is an honest gap rather than a confirmed equivalent. Differences in allowed species, ash/protein limits, or processing wording are noted per cell above rather than asserted as identical.
Multilingual names (official where free)
- EN (EU): see per-jurisdiction entry above
- ZH (CN): 莱菔子
- ES / FR / DE (EUR-Lex 68/2013 official 24-language versions): pending — collection via EUR-Lex multilingual fetch is the O2 multilingual prerequisite (Tokyo relay + headless fetch)
- JA (MAFF 成分规格) / KO (NIAS 사료관리법 별표) / RU (EAEU TR): pending — collection pending
> Method: derived_from_dataset. Every quoted name/definition is from the first-hand source cited per cell. Equivalence is a derived editorial judgement anchored on Latin name + process; where jurisdictions use different regulatory units the verdict is closest_with_differences / no_confirmed_equivalent rather than 'same'.