{"topic_id":"pfi-pflm_002","category":"us-2026","context":"---\ntopic_id: pfi-pflm_002\ncategory: PFI-PFLM\ntitle: For Dual language Packages, does the second language have to be the same font?\nlang: en\nsource: pfi_pflm_faqs_202507.pdf\ndate_parsed: 2026-07-18\ntokens_estimated: 719\n---\n\nFor Dual language Packages, does the second language have to be the same font?\nThe reference, 21CFR501.15, says that if there is any translation put on a package, then every mandated\nelement must also be translated. This regulation is about prominence (think both size and contrast as factors\nin prominence) of required statements and it covers conditions when an alternate language is included.\nMandated language, whether translated or not, should be in the same size as mandated for English. It is not\nallowed to squeeze down mandated language because of lack of space due to the inclusion of the alternate\nlanguage or optional Marketing language. However, you need to check with the country you are selling in for\ntheir requirements. Canada has requirements that anything translated needs to be in the same size.\n\nWhen declaring Salmon (or similar multi-specie fish) as an ingredient, are manufacturers\nrequired to identify the species of salmon?\nThis is more an ingredient question than PFLM, but Salmon is an acceptable market and common name listed\nin the FDA Seafood List.\n","sources":[],"tokens_estimated":719,"generated_at":null,"tip":"Use /api/v1/topics to discover more topics. /api/v1/nutrient for precise single-point queries. /api/v1/cross_compare for 2-3 standard comparisons."}